A logic for reasoning about responsibility

نویسندگان

  • Tiago De Lima
  • Lambèr M. M. Royakkers
  • Frank Dignum
چکیده

One way to allocate tasks to agents is by ascribing them obligations. From obligations to be, agents are able to infer what are the forbidden, permitted and obligatory actions they may perform, by using the wellknown Meyer’s reduction from obligations to be to obligations to do. However, we show through an example that this method is not completely adequate to guide agents’ decisions. We then propose a solution using, instead of obligations, the concept of ‘responsibility’. To formalise responsibility we use a multi-agent extension of propositional dynamic logic as framework, and then we define some basic concepts, such as ‘agent ability’, also briefly discussing the problem of uniform strategies and a possible solution. In the last part, we show that our framework can be used in the specification of normative multi-agent systems, by presenting an extensive running example.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Modelling Moral Reasoning and Ethical Responsibility with Logic Programming

In this paper, we investigate the use of high-level action languages for representing and reasoning about ethical responsibility in goal specification domains. First, we present a simplified Event Calculus formulated as a logic program under the stable model semantics in order to represent situations within Answer Set Programming. Second, we introduce a model of causality that allows us to use ...

متن کامل

ROBUSTNESS OF THE TRIPLE IMPLICATION INFERENCE METHOD BASED ON THE WEIGHTED LOGIC METRIC

This paper focuses on the robustness problem of full implication triple implication inference method for fuzzy reasoning. First of all, based on strong regular implication, the weighted logic metric for measuring distance between two fuzzy sets is proposed. Besides, under this metric, some robustness results of the triple implication method are obtained, which demonstrates that the triple impli...

متن کامل

Attributing Distributed Responsibility in Stit Logic

One important function of logics of agency (Stit Logic, ATL, CL, Dynamic Logic) is to assess the validity of arguments whereby responsibility is attributed to, or denied by, individuals and groups. Indeed, the vocabulary and computational properties of such logic allow us to express and reason on what agents did, or what empowered them to do (either following a strategy as in ATL or not). It is...

متن کامل

Syntactic Knowledge: A Logic of Reasoning, Communication and Cooperation

This paper presents a logic for reasoning about the explicit knowledge of agents who represent their knowledge as finite sets of logical formulae, and who can change their knowledge by reasoning and communicating. No assumptions about closure or consistency conditions on the sets, or about soundness or completeness of the reasoning mechanisms, are made. Traditional epistemic logic, based on mod...

متن کامل

A Deontic Relevant Logic Approach to Reasoning about Actions in Computing Anticipatory Systems

A computing anticipatory system must have the ability to make decision about its next action. To design and develop various computing anticipatory systems effectively, it is desirable to find a general methodology for decision making in computing anticipatory systems. This paper presents a deontic relevant logic approach to reasoning about actions in computing anticipatory systems. The paper di...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Logic Journal of the IGPL

دوره 18  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010